@drportnay
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Another reason to measure cardioCRP
New Concept tested: Plaque Sealing
Final Rule Includes Phased In Cuts for Cardiology
From the ACC - News for Cardiologist and their patients
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) today released its 2010 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, which includes policy proposals that will significantly reduce payments for cardiovascular-related services. While CMS has attempted to mitigate the impacts of the cuts by spreading them out over a four-year period, the impact of the cuts is still enormous both for 2010 and beyond. Cuts of this magnitude—whether enacted this year or spread over four—cannot be absorbed and we will continue to fight the implementation of this data until a rigorous review is conducted.
The ACC understands the very real impacts these cuts will have on your practices, your staff and your patients. The College is exploring all options and staff and leaders are working together to help you understand all of your options. Below is a high-level summary of the policy changes finalized in the rule. In addition, we've also provided links to the tools and resources available to you now.
More information over the coming weeks will be provided in Cardiology magazine, ACC News and The ACC Advocate. Please also plan to join ACC CEO Jack Lewin and President Alfred Bove, M.D., F.A.C.C., for an all-member call on Nov. 12 from 4:00 to 5:30 p.m. (EST) to discuss the 2010 rule. To RSVP for the call, click here.
RULE HIGHLIGHTS:
Practice Expense: Despite the hundreds of calls and letters from you, members of Congress and patients, CMS has chosen to incorporate the results of the American Medical Association's Physician Practice Information Survey into its formula for calculating practice expense relative value units (RVUs). In a slight change from the proposed rule, the agency has said the cuts will be phased in over a four-year period versus all at once. With the exception of evaluation and management services, nearly all services that cardiologists perform will see cuts ranging from 10 percent to more than 40 percent for individual services phased in over 4 years. A few key examples for 2010 alone:
- SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (78452) – 36 percent cut -- NUCLEAR STRESS TESTING
- Transthoracic echo with spectral and color flow Doppler (93306)--10 percent cut
- Coronary Stent (92980) - 4 percent cut
- EKG (93000 )-- 5 percent cut
- Level 4 established patient office visit (99214) -- 7 percent increase
As mentioned above, the ACC is exploring several options for stopping the implementation of these cuts. CMS' decision to phase-in the cuts, while not what we would have hoped, is due in large part to your tremendous efforts over the last few months. Your actions clearly had an impact and we strongly encourage you to continue to email your congressional representatives and CMS detailing the ramifications of these cuts as we move into the next phase of challenging these cuts.
Bundled codes for myocardial perfusion/SPECT imaging
CMS's continued pressure to bundled together imaging services reported with multiple codes has now hit myocardial perfusion imaging. In 2010 myocardial perfusion imaging/SPECT studies including wall motion and ejection fraction will now be reported with a single code. CMS decided to substantially reduce the payment for myocardial perfusion imaging as part of this rule by reducing both the physician work value and the practice expense value. To make matters worse, because there is a new code for the service, CMS apparently is not applying the four-year transition of the practice expense cuts and instead is using the fully implemented value. The result is a 36% cut in payment for 2010. This change alone accounts for more than one-third of the projected payment cut to cardiology. ACC will begin immediately to pursue strategies to mitigate this cut. Specifics on the new codes and tips on how to work with health plans to transition to the new codes will be emailed to you next week and also included in the November issue of Cardiology magazine.
Consultations: Payments for consultations provided in office and hospital settings are eliminated under the final rule. The RVUs assigned to these codes will be redistributed to office and hospital visits and services now billed as consultations will be billed as hospital or office visits. This will reduce payments to varying degrees for consultation services.
Malpractice: CMS has chosen to update the malpractice RVUs with data from a new survey of specialty-level malpractice premiums. In addition, CMS has proposed a new method for determining malpractice RVUs for technical component services. The proposed new malpractice RVUs would reduce cardiology payments by 1 percent. However, the impact will vary depending on the mix of services provided.
Equipment utilization: CMS has finalized its proposal to change the agency's formula for calculating the per-procedure cost of diagnostic medical equipment worth more than $1 million. The proposal would assume that all diagnostic equipment with an acquisition cost greater than $1 million is used 90 percent of the time an office is open, thus driving down the practice expense RVUs for services using that equipment. Within cardiology, cardiac MR and cardiac CT services will be subject to payments set based on this utilization assumption. CMS did agree not to apply this cut to equipment for non-hospital cardiac catheterization services.
SGR: As required by current law, the final rule includes a 21.5 percent reduction in Medicare Physician Payment as of Jan. 1, 2010. This cut is in addition to the payment reductions that result from the proposed policy changes described above. In short, there could be as high as a 30 percent cut in Medicare payments for cardiology. However, as in previous years, Congress is expected to pass a one to two year fix this fall. CMS did finalize its proposal to remove physician-administered drugs from the accumulated SGR debt, which makes a fix to SGR less expensive.
A Heart-Healthy Diet and Medication Cut His Heart Disease Ris
As printed on "www.health.com" -- Great story
Though he knew he had high cholesterol, Paul Tasner, 62, of Greenbrae, Calif., didn't realize it was high enough to put him at risk for a heart attack until he got a thorough checkup from his doctor. Unable to lower his cholesterol level through diet and exercise alone, Tasner decided to take the statin Lipitor—and he's glad he did
I've always had high cholesterol, and I tried to get it down with diet and exercise. But as I've gotten older, I've put on weight. I travel a lot for work, and what I really dislike about business travel is that it disrupts my life. Not every hotel has an exercise room, and unless you're very fortunate, you're not in a place where healthy food is plentiful. Sometimes a family-style chain restaurant is the best place to eat, and you can't find anything healthy on the menu there unless you eat salad every day.
I think the quality of food is important for your health. My wife is pretty focused on healthy eating. We don't eat a lot of fried foods. We try to buy organic fruits and vegetables, though that's something that's not available to everybody. But I hope I don't sabotage that entirely with some of my unhealthy food practices. I'm kind of a chocoholic and I love bread and baked goods. I love the street pretzels in San Francisco.
My doctor said that if I could lower my cholesterol naturally, great. But if not, he recommended Lipitor for my particular profile. I gave it a try, but I couldn't budge the number, quite honestly. I never like to take drugs, I've always resisted, feeling like 10 years from now they might find out that it's bad for you. Nonetheless I started taking Lipitor, and I'm glad I did because two weeks later my cholesterol was slashed in half. I've been taking it for several years now and haven't seen any side effects. The worst reported side effect is liver damage, but I get physicals regularly with tests for liver functions and I seem to be doing fine.
I want to live a long and active life. My father lived to be 73; that's not old anymore. I believe his father, my grandfather, was in his 60s when he died. They both died of heart disease. Being severely compromised by a stroke or something equally debilitating really scares me. I don't want to be crippled. I don't want to not be able to move around and travel and live my life. I like working, visiting my family, and seeing my grandchildren. I don't want that taken away from me.
In Hand Washing, Technique More Important Than Technology
10/29/09 - Good Morning America did a segment of handwashing
They actually rubbed their hands with E Coli and used either soap or hand sanitizer to see which worked better
Results:
"The first thing we noticed is that alcohol-based hand sanitizer clearly works the best. In fact, the CDC says you should use a hand sanitizer containing at least 60 percent alcohol. " The most popular product on the market is Purell, which has 62% alcohol.
"As for soap, the antibacterial soap worked only slightly better than the regular soap."
"The Food and Drug Administration recommends using only regular soap because of worries that germs will develop resistance, and people will develop laziness from high-tech soap. Based on the results that we got, it's really not necessary to use antimicrobials in the products. You can see some difference, but it's really not significant"
PLEASE WASH YOUR HANDS!!!!!
Sleep Apnea Treatment Helps Your Golf Game
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Monday, November 2, 2009
CMS announces physician payment cuts
The Wall Street Journal (10/31, Favole, subscription required) reported that the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced new rules to cut payments for physicians who use expensive medical-imaging equipment. Under the rules, the use of equipment for MRIs and CT scans to screen for diseases will result in cuts of up to 38 percent for physicians who are paid under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.
Bloomberg News (10/31, Nussbaum) reported that CMS also announced a "21.5 percent cut for all physicians" with "lower reimbursements for specialists." The "reductions will be made over four years rather than imposed at once in 2010." According to Allen S. Lichter, chief executive officer of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, "cancer-care doctors will see a six percent reduction over four years." Meanwhile, Jack Lewin, chief executive officer American College of Cardiology, noted that "the phase-in means 'a slow death' for heart doctors."
Lewin noted that "the rule puts into effect policy proposals that will unacceptably reduce payments for cardiovascular-related services," CQ HealthBeat (10/31, Reichard, subscription required) reported.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry